[Taxacom] Taxacom Digest, Vol 65, Issue 12
jgrehan at sciencebuff.org
Fri Aug 12 13:55:05 CDT 2011
But that is my point too, one has to designate what represent features unique or derived for the ingroup taxa for the analysis to be meaningful.
From: Sergio Vargas [mailto:sevragorgia at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 2:16 PM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu; John Grehan
Subject: Re: Taxacom Digest, Vol 65, Issue 12
SV: Binary transformation series, whether restricted in a way that one character state is present in the ingroup and absent in the outgroup or not, contribute the same number of steps to a parsimony analysis independently of the polarity assessment so identifying polarity in this characters prior to the analysis is irrelevant."
JG: But an algorithm cannot distinguish derived states if they are not specified. If one mixes in non-derived states and codes them as such, then no problem - but then why bother including them?
Well yes, but that's precisely the point, the algorithm recognizes a change from a character state to other and adds a step to the global step counts. For the algorithm derived/non-derived means nothing. Polarity is only use afterwards for interpreting the cladogram and requires rooting the cladogram using an outgroup (but you could use an hypothetical ancestor too). All phylogenetic software available operate over unrooted trees. Trees are "rooted" only for visualization (and polarity interpretations).
Sergio Vargas R., M.Sc.
Dept. of Earth& Environmental Sciences
tel. +49 89 2180 17929
s.vargas at lrz.uni-muenchen.de
sevra at marinemolecularevolution.org
check my webpage:
check my research ID:
More information about the Taxacom