[Taxacom] Order Campanulales (worth maintaining?)
Kim van der Linde
kim at kimvdlinde.com
Wed Feb 16 13:03:57 CST 2011
I think this question is impossible to answer without knowing the wider
context. I normally prefer some consistency such that the clade of the
same rank are comparable in characteristics such as age, degree of
divergence in morphological characteristics etc. Whether a clade is
speciose or not is not crucial for me.
On 2/15/2011 9:58 PM, Kenneth Kinman wrote:
> Hi all,
> Since I haven't updated my angiosperm classification in almost 2
> years, I was looking at some possible changes, especially some minor
> coding changes.
> However, in the process, I also began to wonder about whether to
> continue separating Order Campanulales from Order Asterales (which were
> merged in APG II). Although Order Campanulales may now only include two
> families (Campanulaceae and Rousseaceae), it is still rather speciose.
> Anyway, I have no strong inclination one way or the other in this
> case. So I wonder if any taxacomers have any preferences one way or the
> other? Lump Order Campanulales into Asterales, or keep them as separate
> sister Orders?
> Ken Kinman
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
> (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
> Or (2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
More information about the Taxacom