[Taxacom] Fwd: Re Funding biodiversity?
Richard.Zander at mobot.org
Fri Jan 28 15:02:39 CST 2011
The Linnaean project is hypothesis-driven and we have been participants for 250 years.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Richard H. Zander
Missouri Botanical Garden, PO Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166-0299 USA
Web sites: http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/resbot/ and http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/bfna/bfnamenu.htm
Modern Evolutionary Systematics Web site: http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/resbot/21EvSy.htm
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Sergio Vargas
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 2:55 PM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: [Taxacom] Fwd: Re Funding biodiversity?
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re Funding biodiversity?
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 21:52:35 +0100
From: Sergio Vargas <s.vargas at lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
To: kennethkinman at webtv.net, taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
just a brief question:
what's real biodiversity research?
and a comment,
>How does this kind of research get priority over real biodiversity research?
I've noticed that funding agencies tend to favor hypothesis-driven
research and to avoid funding long-term inventory work with no clear
outcome but "a list" of what's there and some new species... don't know
just my perception perhaps. But I might be missunderstanding what "real
biodiversity research" is anyways.
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
Or (2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
More information about the Taxacom