[Taxacom] Call for proxy votes for the forthcomingInternational Bot. Congr.
Richard.Zander at mobot.org
Sat Jul 9 12:19:21 CDT 2011
I give up. Mary Barkworth and Curtis Clarke are both right. Conservation
and rejection of types is about both taxonomy and nomenclature . . .
and, above all, precise argumentation. I wonder what "side" I would be
on if I really, really cared about Acacia.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Richard H. Zander
Missouri Botanical Garden, PO Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166-0299 USA
Web sites: http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/resbot/ and
Modern Evolutionary Systematics Web site:
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Curtis Clark
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 1:05 PM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Call for proxy votes for the
forthcomingInternational Bot. Congr.
On 7/7/2011 8:25 AM, Richard Zander wrote:
> Again, the problem is in taxonomic and evolutionary definitions, not
It would seem to me that conservation and rejection of types is almsot
always about circumscription, which is taxonomy.
More information about the Taxacom