[Taxacom] latin out of botany
lists at curtisclark.org
Thu Jul 21 00:40:12 CDT 2011
On 7/20/2011 9:37 AM, Jacques Melot wrote:
> [J. M.] C'est-à-dire... « English or Latin ».
> C'est bien ce que je disais : beaucoup
> d'anglophones ne connaissent plus la fonction de
> « or »... et les inconditionnels de l'anglais
> prétendents pourtant imposer cette langue comme
> langue universelle de la botanique !
The existence of the mathematical operator "xor" (exclusive "or") is
clear evidence that "or" in English once meant the same as "and/or" of
modern usage. English evolves faster than most perennial plant species.
How can using it for diagnosis be a good thing?
I am reminded of an article I once reviewed that contained diagnoses in
both Latin and English. I glanced at the English and went on to the
Latin, which was, in part, incomprehensible. I went back to the English.
It had one or two nouns modifying another noun (it was long enough ago
that I don't remember the wording), a common source of ambiguity in
English. As a native English speaker, I subconsciously resolved the
ambiguity, but the authors had tried to maintain the words as nouns in
Latin, leading to incomprehension without reference to the English.
Cal Poly Pomona
More information about the Taxacom