[Taxacom] Hedges /Kumar (eds) The Timetree of Life
jgrehan at sciencebuff.org
Mon May 16 14:55:43 CDT 2011
You misunderstand my original statement. It was only that the title of
the project which I said should have been "DNA sequence time tree"
instead of "TimeTree of Life". I did not deride the content as you
I guess you have not read all those papers that do use them as maximal
age. There are many such papers and the recent critique of this practice
by Heads (2005) will give you plenty of examples.
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Jason Mate
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Hedges /Kumar (eds) The Timetree of Life
criticism is fair game as long as you back it up with facts. If you have
read any of the articles (i.e. Hepialids) point at the problems you see.
But deriding all books that use or rely on molecular data as propaganda
is just boring. You may have good points but you are just not fleshing
As for the use of fossil evidence, I have yet to come across a case were
they use them as maximal age when dating trees. It just makes no sense
to state that you have the fossil of the very first
exemplar of a taxon.
mail/taxacom your search terms here
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
(2) a Google search specified as:
site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
More information about the Taxacom