[Taxacom] validation of taxon names

Armand Turpel armand.turpel.mnhn at gmail.com
Wed Feb 15 02:59:53 CST 2012

Hi Stephen,

Yes i think it is important that the information should flow back from 
the end user to the related organization. During my work with the col 
data i observed errors in the data which I communicated back to the col 
team. This was only possible since col provide its whole database for 
download. I like this openness.

It is in the interests of all who work with taxonomic data that this 
data should be from good quality.


On 14/02/2012 22:02, Stephen Thorpe wrote:
> Hi Armand,
> Your question opens a familiar "can of worms", as we say!
> Currently, there is no comprehensive source of validated scientific names, and certain vagueness in some ICZN Code articles makes it unlikely that there could ever be a robust notion of name availability.
> I work on Wikispecies to create something akin to what you want, except that I try to make the names verifiable by the user, rather than just saying "you can trust me". Hence, it involves work on the part of the user. Most users want someone else to do the work, and to be "spoon fed" with validated names, but this just isn't realistic ...
> Cheers,
> Stephen
> ________________________________
>   From: Armand Turpel<armand.turpel.mnhn at gmail.com>
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 9:42 PM
> Subject: [Taxacom] validation of taxon names
> Hi,
> We have a database with over 80000 species taxon names which we want to
> compare and validate against other databases. Doing this job isn’t very
> easy:
> 1. The majority of organizations only provide web interfaces to search
> for single taxon names.
> 2. Copyrights of data are some times not very clear
> 3. Quality of data is doubtful.>
> - Lamia amputator Guérin-Méneville, 1844
> - Lamia amputator Guerin-Meneville, 1844
> - Lamia amputator Guérin-Méneville
> - …...
> The only organization we know that provide its whole database for
> download is species2000 (catalogue of life>  COL). We created a
> postgresql version for the COL data from which it is possible to compare
> a big number of taxon names in one run. Postgresql provide good fuzzy
> string algorithms. But the COL data isn’t error free and it isn’t
> complete for our region.
> The question is: Which organization provide trustful, complete (as
> possible) and full accessible data?
> a+
> arm
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> (2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here

More information about the Taxacom mailing list