[Taxacom] validation of taxon names

Paul Kirk p.kirk at cabi.org
Wed Feb 15 12:51:43 CST 2012

registration of new names (new taxa, new combinations, new names) of fungi (and organisms treated as fungi) becomes mandatory 1/1/2013 ... :-)

registration of typifications (lecto-, neo-, epi-) will be voluntary for the next 5 years ... :-(


From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] on behalf of Doug Yanega [dyanega at ucr.edu]
Sent: 15 February 2012 18:40
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] validation of taxon names

I would observe that, for zoological names, of the following list:

>1. Is this a name?
>2. Is this the correct way to write it?
>3. Is this name currently in use?
>4. What other names are related to this name (e.g., synonyms,
>lexical variants)?
>5. Where was this name published? Can I see that publication?

at least 1 and 5 are questions for which an objective and definitive
answer (via application of the ICZN for #1) can be arrived at, and
that the answer will not change. Thus, these are things which could
be made part of a permanent public archive (hopefully, something like

#2 and 3 are things that can, in essence, be objectively determined
under the Code, but are subject to the nuance of "prevailing usage" -
that is, a sudden change in how taxonomists treat a name can shift
the answer from "no" to "yes" (in both cases) or from "yes" to "no"
(for #2). One hope that I have is that a mechanism for Registration
can be implemented in the future which will prevent such fluctuation,
and thus make the answers to 2 and 3 immutable, as well.

#4 is something that cannot be objectively determined, because
synonymy is almost invariably subjective.

Realistically, then, this list represents a mixed bag of the
immediately attainable, the potentially attainable, and the
unattainable. It might be more productive to focus on the former
categories, in terms of a community-wide goal. I'll further note that
if taxonomists want a system of Registration that will result in
permanently stable names, then they are probably going to have to
insist upon it, *and* be willing to participate in the process
(because such a process is likely to require public review). I'm not
100% sure whether botanical names would work exactly the same way,
but I expect that the situation would be pretty much the same.


Doug Yanega        Dept. of Entomology         Entomology Research Museum
Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0314        skype: dyanega
phone: (951) 827-4315 (standard disclaimer: opinions are mine, not UCR's)
   "There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness
         is the true method" - Herman Melville, Moby Dick, Chap. 82


Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:

(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org

(2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
The information contained in this e-mail and any files transmitted with it is confidential and is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is prohibited.

Whilst CAB International trading as CABI takes steps to prevent the transmission of viruses via e-mail, we cannot guarantee that any e-mail or attachment is free from computer viruses and you are strongly advised to undertake your own anti-virus precautions.

If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail at cabi at cabi.org or by telephone on +44 (0)1491 829199 and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it.

CABI is an International Organization recognised by the UK Government under Statutory Instrument 1982 No. 1071.


More information about the Taxacom mailing list