[Taxacom] validation of taxon names
stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Fri Feb 17 17:37:32 CST 2012
OK, but I think this poses a big problem for biodiversity informatics, that is, if they want to provide something that is actually useful to general users (including governments concerned with biosecurity and/or conservation issues, which require data of a certain kind)
yes, a biodiversity database could index species under their original combinations, e.g., Diarthrocera formicaephila Broun, 1893, and then simply list alternative names in chronological order, which, in the present case would end with: Diarthrocera formicaephila Broun, 1893 according to Maddison in Macfarlane et al. (2010)
but who is going to be able to make any practical use out of such information???
From: Richard Pyle <deepreef at bishopmuseum.org>
To: TAXACOM at MAILMAN.NHM.KU.EDU
Sent: Saturday, 18 February 2012 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] validation of taxon names
Thanks, Stephen - I largely agree.
> So, the question is, what is the currently valid name of
> Diarthrocera formicaephila Broun, 1893??
As I said (or, at least implied) in my previous post: there is no such
thing as "currently valid", without a context of "currently", and an
"according to whom".
This message is only intended for the addressee named above. Its contents may be privileged or otherwise protected. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this message or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us immediately by reply mail or by collect telephone call. Any personal opinions expressed in this message do not necessarily represent the views of the Bishop Museum.
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
(2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
More information about the Taxacom