[Taxacom] Xanthocyparis (was: Validation of taxon names)

Paul van Rijckevorsel dipteryx at freeler.nl
Sun Feb 19 02:32:10 CST 2012

I don't follow this. In as far as the 2011 Congress was supposed to make
a decision on Xanthocyparis, it did do so

As to the time taken to make a decision, certainly in the case of
Xanthocyparis the relevant permanent Committee made up its mind quickly,
and came up with a recommendation. It must be admitted that the General
Committee then was notably slow in following up, publishing its
recommendation only after the 2011 Congress.

It would be possible, at least theoretically, to set up a voting mechanism
that could make decisions between Congresses, but this would be a big
change as voting power at a Congress is determined, to a great extent,
by who is actually present. To be able to make decisions between
Congresses there would have to be a new mechanism to determine
who has voting rights.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kenneth Kinman" <kennethkinman at webtv.net>
To: <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 3:54 AM
Subject: [Taxacom] Xanthocyparis (was: Validation of taxon names)

> Dear All,
>      Sometimes circumscription or other related considerations are not
> the biggest problem.  Sometimes, we simply need a speedier resolution of
> problems by Codes, Congresses (and/or their Committees).
>      The problem of Xanthocyparis was supposed to be finally decided at
> the 2011 Congress, but for some reason it was not.  In the Internet Age,
> perhaps it should no longer be necessary to delay such decisions like
> they are emulating the U.S. Congress.
>       That a decision on such matters MUST await a physical
> get-together Congress seems old-fashioned and unnecessary in the first
> place (unless delay is your goal).  That it was not finally decided in
> 2011 is difficult to understand.  Something is clearly still standing in
> the way of timely decisions on such matters, and in the Internet Age
> there surely must be a better and more timely way to address such
> issues.  Such delays were certainly inevitable in the past, but in the
> 21st Century such delays seem anachronistic and preventable.  If the
> Code still prevents timely resolutions, it needs to be changed so that
> such decisions can be made quickly (a year or two at most).  There is
> really no excuse for dragging out such decisions longer than that in a
> time of instant communication via Internet.
>           ------------Ken
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
> these methods:
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> (2) a Google search specified as:
> site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here

More information about the Taxacom mailing list