[Taxacom] validation of taxon names
mesibov at southcom.com.au
Sun Feb 19 16:54:46 CST 2012
Ken Walker wrote:
'Why then are global social science websites such as Project Noah, iNaturalist, iSpot, Mushroom Observer etc so popular, so well used and provide a vehicle for non-specialists to make a contribution to biodiversity and Biosecurity? ... The socialisation of science needs a "Gigantic All-Names All-Species Online Taxonomic Resource (GAAOTR)".'
So one section of the 'we' is citizen scientists making and recording field observations? Excellent. That gives us even more information than we already have about the usual suspects (vertebrates, large and charismatic invertebrates, flowering plants, large fruiting fungi). Is that 'we' going to be interested in upgrading the info concerning the other 90+% of the biota in the GAAOTR?
Stephen Thorpe wrote:
"it is possible to achieve, but the main problem is stopping the proliferation of errors along the acronym food chain ... as I'm sure Bob would agree?...
as I said in response to something that Chris Thompson said, I don't think that working specialist taxonomists are necessarily the best people to do this, although they should certainly be consulted along the way ..."
Sorry, I don't agree that the main problem in erecting a GAAOTR is stopping the proliferation of errors. It's adding new taxa, something you've pointed out many times on this list. Working specialist taxonomists are currently the people doing this (although that could change in future). The tweaking of what's already known can be done by non-specialists, sure, but when a biodiversity crisis comes up (think of controlling an invasive species) and the GAAOTR doesn't provide links to enough relevant info, it's back to the specialists, who could have been consulted first, to save time.
Dr Robert Mesibov
Honorary Research Associate
Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery
Home contact: PO Box 101, Penguin, Tasmania, Australia 7316
Ph: (03) 64371195; 61 3 64371195
More information about the Taxacom