[Taxacom] FW: cladistic analysis for morphological characters -- UPGMA is not cladistics

Richard Pyle deepreef at bishopmuseum.org
Tue Nov 13 11:33:21 CST 2012


> Hey, I think after years and years we are slowly, slowly converging on
> agreeing what the question is for all those answers in the literature.

Weird how all those answers end up being "42".

Aloha,
Rich





More information about the Taxacom mailing list