[Taxacom] FW: cladistic analysis for morphological characters -- UPGMA is not cladistics

John Grehan calabar.john at gmail.com
Tue Nov 13 11:59:42 CST 2012


Yeah, but what does 42 mean?

John Grehan

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Richard Pyle <deepreef at bishopmuseum.org>wrote:

> > Hey, I think after years and years we are slowly, slowly converging on
> > agreeing what the question is for all those answers in the literature.
>
> Weird how all those answers end up being "42".
>
> Aloha,
> Rich
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
> these methods:
>
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> (2) a Google search specified as:  site:
> mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
>



More information about the Taxacom mailing list