[Taxacom] FW: cladistic analysis for morphological characters -- UPGMA is not cladistics
calabar.john at gmail.com
Tue Nov 13 11:59:42 CST 2012
Yeah, but what does 42 mean?
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Richard Pyle <deepreef at bishopmuseum.org>wrote:
> > Hey, I think after years and years we are slowly, slowly converging on
> > agreeing what the question is for all those answers in the literature.
> Weird how all those answers end up being "42".
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
> these methods:
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> (2) a Google search specified as: site:
> mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
More information about the Taxacom