[Taxacom] ubiquist??

Stephen Thorpe stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Mon Oct 1 21:32:43 CDT 2012


just wundrin' ...



________________________________
From: Mark WIlden <mark at mwilden.com>
To: Stephen Thorpe <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz> 
Cc: "taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> 
Sent: Tuesday, 2 October 2012 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] ubiquist??

Is there a problem, here? Would anyone seriously be confused by this usage?

On Oct 1, 2012, at 7:03 PM, Stephen Thorpe <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz> wrote:

> Since when did biologists start using the term ubiquist instead of ubiquitous??
> http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0046056
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> 
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
> 
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org/
> 
> (2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here


More information about the Taxacom mailing list