[Taxacom] ubiquist??

Adolf Ceska aceska at telus.net
Mon Oct 1 22:25:17 CDT 2012

What is wrong with a ventriloquist? Adolf Ceska

-----Original Message-----
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Ken Kinman
Sent: October-01-12 8:15 PM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] ubiquist??

   Yes, when they use the phrase "ubiquist species" several times, it could
be regarded as a noun in apposition.  However, the phrase "as ubiquist" in
the abstract is clearly not a noun in apposition, and thus potentially
confusing to some.  But still no big deal.

Subject: Re: [Taxacom] ubiquist??
From: mark at mwilden.com
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 20:01:53 -0700
To: kinman at hotmail.com

It could be a noun in apposition.

On Oct 1, 2012, at 7:53 PM, Ken Kinman <kinman at hotmail.com> wrote:

Hi Mark,       No serious confusion for most.  However, ubiquist should
probably always be used as a noun, and they clearly used it as an adjective
when they said "as ubiquist" in the abstract, instead of "as ubiquitous".
No big deal though.                   --------------Ken 
> From: mark at mwilden.com
> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 19:22:32 -0700
> To: stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
> CC: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] ubiquist??
> Is there a problem, here? Would anyone seriously be confused by this
> On Oct 1, 2012, at 7:03 PM, Stephen Thorpe <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>
> > Since when did biologists start using the term ubiquist instead of
> > http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0
> > 046056 _______________________________________________
> >  		 	   		  

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these

(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org

(2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom
your search terms here

More information about the Taxacom mailing list