[Taxacom] considerations for erecting (or sinking) higher taxa

Ken Kinman kinman at hotmail.com
Thu Oct 4 20:49:05 CDT 2012

Hi Michael, 
          Well, over the years, Ernst Mayr tackled that subject on every taxonomic level from superspecies to Domains and Empires.  You might start with the book by Mayr and Ashlock, 1991 (Principles of Systematic Zoology, 2nd Edition) and references therein.  And for a discussion mainly at higher taxonomic levels (Kingdoms, Phyla, and Classes), try Thomas Cavalier-Smith, 1998 ("A Revised Six-Kingdom System of Life"; Biol. Rev. 73:203-266).  They are both adherents of one criterion in particular (Principle of Balance).   However, I believe Mayr did a better overall job with another pair of criteria (maximizing the stability of names whenever possible, without sacrificing informativeness/utility).         
> From: msharkey at uky.edu
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 18:30:29 +0000
> Subject: [Taxacom] considerations for erecting (or sinking) higher taxa
> Hello all,
> Does anyone have references to papers that discuss criteria for erecting (or sinking) taxa above the species level. (Besides the obvious monophyly).
> Thanks in advance
> Mike
> Michael Sharkey
> Department of Entomology
> University of Kentucky
> Lexington KY 40546-0091
> (859) 257-9364
> msharkey at uky.edu
> www.sharkeylab.org
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> (2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here

More information about the Taxacom mailing list