[Taxacom] Best usage - spp (no period) or spp.?

Boyle, Bradley L - (bboyle) bboyle at email.arizona.edu
Wed Oct 10 14:18:43 CDT 2012

Hi Tony,

"cf." is an abbreviation for "confer" and therefore takes a period. See: W.T. Stern, Botanical Latin (Chap. XXVI, "Symbols and Abbreviations").

Unless of course your editorial policy and/or particular flavo(u)r of English allows abbreviations without periods....


On Oct 10, 2012, at 10:00 AM, <taxacom-request at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
 <taxacom-request at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> wrote:

> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:18:48 +1100
> From: <Tony.Rees at csiro.au>
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Best usage - spp (no period) or spp.?
> To: <sean.r.edwards at btinternet.com>, <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
> Message-ID:
> 	<C2994967ABB5D54BB013821E4ABA60E105E6C908B2 at exvic-mbx03.nexus.csiro.au>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Thanks to all who responded on this interesting (?) thread. These responses have been summarised to the responsible CAAB editors who have agreed to standardise on "spp." for this purpose. The power of the taxacom list is thus once again demonstrated to all.
> Still awaiting significant deliberations regarding a potential change from "cf" to "cf.", however...
> Regards - Tony


Brad Boyle, Ph.D.
Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
University of Arizona
BSW 310, P.O. Box 210088
Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
bboyle at email.arizona.edu

Botanical Information & Ecology Network:

The SALVIAS Project:

Taxonomic Name Resolution Service:

More information about the Taxacom mailing list