[Taxacom] Disclaimer to avoid accidental botanical publication

Anthony Pigott Anthony.Pigott at btinternet.com
Sun Dec 8 18:42:34 CST 2013


Agreed, it would be safer to have no names but in this case it would be
difficult to avoid using some that have already been used informally.


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Kirk [mailto:P.Kirk at kew.org] 
Sent: 08 December 2013 23:06
To: Anthony Pigott; TAXACOM
Subject: RE: [Taxacom] Disclaimer to avoid accidental botanical publication

Simple solution is don't publish the names - '[genus] sp.nov.' with no
epithet would suffice.

From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Anthony Pigott
[Anthony.Pigott at btinternet.com]
Sent: 08 December 2013 23:00
Subject: [Taxacom] Disclaimer to avoid accidental botanical publication

Dear All

I'm helping to edit a field guide to a difficult group of ferns. The author
is sadly no longer with us. There are a number of names used which not been
formally published. Although I don't believe that anything in the guide
would meet the requirements for publication under the Code, I am anxious to
avoid any possibility of accidental publication. I have in mind to state
something such as: "This work is issued with the disclaimer that it is not
intended for the purposes of botanical nomenclature." Would this be
water-tight, or does this need strengthening or changing?

I'm aware that there was some discussion on this with regard to the
Zoological Code on this list a while ago.


Anthony Pigott

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu

The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched with either of these

(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org

(2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom
your search terms here

Celebrating 26 years of Taxacom in 2013.=

More information about the Taxacom mailing list