[Taxacom] BioNames and others names
stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Sat Jun 1 22:11:24 CDT 2013
Lots! Why can't we work together? Largely because of economic factors and human nature. Realistically, there isn't a snowball's chance in hell of working together in perfect harmony on a single unified project, but we should be pushing for slightly higher levels of cooperation. Note that all funded projects are underfunded, given the enormity of the task, so none of them can ever reach completion. It could be done on Wikispecies, but only if lots of contributors are willing to give up a little bit of their time, which they aren't! Nevertheless, I believe that Wikispecies is the most likely to get there first, but I don't know how likely that is. Meanwhile, much $$$ will be spent paying various people to do the same thing on different projects, even though they can never really succeed. But it keeps people employed ...
From: Ricardo <bayshark at bigfoot.com>
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Sent: Sunday, 2 June 2013 2:50 PM
Subject: [Taxacom] BioNames and others names
I would like to know how many organisations doing just the same thing, a
creating list - database of living organisms.
Why we are not able to coordinate money and do just one project properly,
including checking for errors,
One organisation can create list of names, second can add the pictures and
another create list of bibliography (as Biodiversity heritage Library
Tree of Life
Atlas of Living Australia
GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information facility)
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org/
(2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
Celebrating 26 years of Taxacom in 2013.
More information about the Taxacom