[Taxacom] BioNames and others names
Raymond Hoser Snakeman Snakebusters Reptile Parties
viper007 at live.com.au
Sun Jun 2 04:39:37 CDT 2013
"there are so many who claim that there is only
one single correct taxonomic point of view (namely, theirs)."
Hole in one!
Snakebustersâ - Australia's best reptilesâ
The only hands-on reptilesâ shows that lets people hold the animalsâ.
Reptile partiesâ, events, courses
Phones: 9812 3322
0412 777 211
> From: dipteryx at freeler.nl
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 10:16:30 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] BioNames and others names
> From: "Richard Pyle" <deepreef at bishopmuseum.org>
> Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 6:43 AM
> > Stephen is wrong about "Lots". But I don't blame him. The reason it
> > seems like "lots" is, ultimately, the same reason almost no two people
> > agree on what a "taxon name" is. [...]
> This must be a good candidate for "Most Gross Exaggeration
> of the Year". There will be wide agreement (likely a
> comfortable majority) that the scientific name of a taxon,
> in the case of a species is the binomial / binomen,
> or in the case of a lower ranking taxon the trinomial / trinomen.
> For zoologists there are some points of confusion:
> * the status of the "specific name" / "subspecific name"
> * not all "scientific names" are "available names"
> * the question if separate orthographical variants are
> separate scientific names
> But under the ICNafp there is no confusion on these
> points, so these are strictly localized sources of confusion.
> It looks to me that the big real source of confusion is
> (and remains) that taxonomy is (and remains) dynamic,
> and that there are so many who claim that there is only
> one single correct taxonomic point of view (namely, theirs).
> * * *
> > The exact same thing is happening in taxon-name-database
> > sphere. To an outside observer, it might appear that what
> > Catalog of Life, and Encyclopedia of Life, and GBIF, and
> > Bionames, and ION, and Global Names Architecture, and
> > ZooBank, and IPNI, and Tropicos, and Index Fungorum,
> > and any of dozens of other nomenclators, species indexers,
> > checklist-makers, etc. are all "doing the same thing".
> Of these, only Tropicos appears to be mapping different
> taxonomic usages.
> (And yes, I must admit that I don't see any real differences
> between the 'aggregators', except in the interface they use,
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> (2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
> Celebrating 26 years of Taxacom in 2013.
More information about the Taxacom