[Taxacom] human involvement (was Re: BioNames)
pleuronaia at gmail.com
Tue Jun 4 17:08:47 CDT 2013
> For the retrospective stuff, there is very clearly a need for a two-pronged
> 1) Automatic processes to generate a dirty bucket;
> 2) Manual processes (with some semi-automated guidance) to filter & migrate
> the "dirty bucket" into the clean bucket.
Also, dirty buckets need to be clearly indicated as such. Currently,
plenty of dirty buckets are treated as clean, and the problem is compounded
when databases compile whatever they find, making identification of the
original bucket challenging.
Dirty buckets are useful, but only to those who know enough to be able to
dig through the dirt and get whatever is of value.
I'm glad to see increased attention to making it easy to submit
corrections. Generally they will be spotted by someone who is in the midst
of a project, searching for information on a particular taxon, not by
someone who has the time to spare to be systematically making corrections.
Thus, an option to send off a quick note about a problem is more likely to
get used than a complex process, or worse yet, either no evident option or
telling you to contact someone else (and you get to figure out how to
Dr. David Campbell
Assistant Professor, Geology
Department of Natural Sciences
Boiling Springs NC 28017
More information about the Taxacom