[Taxacom] Open access?
dlahr at ib.usp.br
Tue Jun 4 19:37:53 CDT 2013
Adding these types of requirements leaves you with a serious issue that is
dealing with the legacy names that do not comply with the new requirement.
Lists of valid names are basically the only way around this (that I can
see), and there are numerous problems with that as well.
I see the addition of requirements more of a step towards instability in
the current situation.
Removing a requirement (as was done with the Latin descriptions in ICN) is
a whole different issue, because legacy names are not "lacking" a
requirement, and thus, do not need to be included as valid by any type of
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Raymond Hoser Snakeman Snakebusters Reptile
Parties <viper007 at live.com.au> wrote:
> Dear all, in another thread Doug Yanega said
> "Given that
> no one should be doing taxonomy without access to the original
> literature, requiring that an author transcribe the pertinent data into
> ZooBank is not adding very much to their overall effort."
> leads me to ask, should open access and online by a requirement of the
> next code of zoological nomenclature?
> I know it would muck up the "business models" of certain journals, but
> what does everyone else here think?
> All the best
> Snakebustersâ - Australia's best reptilesâ
> The only hands-on reptilesâ shows that lets people hold the animalsâ.
> Reptile partiesâ, events, courses
> Phones: 9812 3322
> 0412 777 211
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched with either of these
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> (2) a Google search specified as: site:
> mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
> Celebrating 26 years of Taxacom in 2013.
Daniel J. G. Lahr, PhD
Assist. Prof., Dept of Zoology,
Univ. of Sao Paulo, Brazil
+ 55 (11) 3091 0948
More information about the Taxacom