[Taxacom] Costello on species again: new paper
aphodiinaemate at gmail.com
Sat Jun 8 07:52:00 CDT 2013
They seem to be taking a leaf out of ECON 101 and developing a taxonomic
GDP: GTP or Gross Taxonomic Product. It has worked really well for the
economy so I can imagine all the positive applications for science (akin to
Impact Factor) for tenure, funding, etc.
On a more serious note, I wonder if you can compare output across time the
way they seem to do. Without wanting to stir the proverbial bucket, maybe
taxonomists are (in general) just gathering more data for each description?
There is the issue of tidying-up previous work, incorporating phylogenetic
information into the descriptions (more data gathering plus analysis);
tracking down types, etc. One only needs to look at descriptions from the
60´s to see that you could have fit them in an A5 double spaced, often with
a single, rather crude illustration. Good luck getting that out nowadays
and not be laughed out ;)
On 8 June 2013 11:44, Stephen Thorpe <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz> wrote:
> Costello, M.J.; Wilson, S.; Houlding, B. 2013: More taxonomists describing
> significantly fewer species per unit effort may indicate that most species
> have been discovered. Systematic biology, doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syt024
> This seems to be "all over the place" - as per usual ...
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched with either of these
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> (2) a Google search specified as: site:
> mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
> Celebrating 26 years of Taxacom in 2013.
More information about the Taxacom