[Taxacom] How to refer to unplaced taxa

Paul Kirk P.Kirk at kew.org
Mon Mar 11 19:20:31 CDT 2013

Keep the 'name element' clean - 'Quedius sydneyensis' or 'Quedius' or 'Quedidae' ... or whatever. All the other stuff - cf. this, aff. that, TFIC sp 07, sp.nov., gen.nov. ... or whatever, is best places elsewhere. And if authors are needed, keep them elsewhere. And if there is an appropriate nomenclator, include the ID issued by the nomenclator. Link data at the source and we will build that web of data we all want and can all use.


From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Grove, Simon (DEDTA) [Simon.Grove at tmag.tas.gov.au]
Sent: 11 March 2013 23:54
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: [Taxacom] How to refer to unplaced taxa

Here's a somewhat more mundane posting for Taxacom, but one I hope that others will be able to help me with:

I'm often in the position of wanting to add records to our museum collections database of specimens or accessions that haven't been identified to the level of species.  There are lots of different reasons for them not having a species assignation.  Sometimes it's because the species is apparently undescribed, but sometimes it's just that none of us has had the time or ability to determine the specimen(s) to this level of taxonomic resolution, but we have at least determined its family, or perhaps even its genus.  And on other occasions, the sample/accession contains representatives of more than one taxon.  Rather than leaving these specimens undatabased, we would like to have some standard ways of referring to them, pending their assignation to taxa with full species binomials.

I've been toying with various words to apply to these taxa and would appreciate some feedback.

*         If I know the genus but haven't ascertained the species, I'm inclined to database the specimen as, for example, 'Quedius species'.  I would do this whether the reason for not knowing the species was because I hadn't yet tried hard enough or because it was an undescribed species.  However, it the undescribed species had been given a collection-wide code-name (i.e. it was a 'known unknown'), then I would be inclined to use that name instead, e.g. 'Quedius TFIC sp 07'.  I'm inclined to avoid using the terms 'aff.' and 'cf.', - for example 'Quedius sp. aff. sydneyensis', if only because they can be applied rather loosely and I'm not sure that other experts not involved in assigning them can be expected to trust them.

*         If I don't even know the genus but know something about its higher classification, I'm inclined to use a pseudo-binomial that combines this taxonomic resolution with the word 'unplaced' instead of 'species', for example 'Staphylininae unplaced', or 'Coleoptera unplaced'.

*         If the accession seems likely to contain a mix of taxa, I'm inclined to use a pseudo-binomial that couples the name for the lowest common denominator in the taxonomic hierarchy with the word 'undifferentiated', for example 'Coleoptera undifferentiated', or 'Insecta undifferentiated' (and let's not get into a discussion here about whether 'Insecta' is a valid taxon!).

Does this make sense?  Are there any better systems out there? I appreciate that others may use the word 'species' in each of these scenarios, but that ultimately conveys less information, or could confuse non-taxonomists into thinking that a taxon such as 'Coleoptera' is of the same (specific) rank as, say, Quedius.  On the other hand, even the word 'species' is ambiguous because it could refer to either one or many species, since its plural form is the same as its singular form.  In that case, maybe always using the abbreviations 'sp.' and 'spp.' would be preferable to reduce ambiguity?  And then there's the issue that using words such as 'unplaced' and 'undifferentiated' in binomials really only makes sense to English-speakers, whereas scientific names are meant to be universal.

Any comments?


Dr Simon Grove
Senior Curator, Invertebrate Zoology
Tasmanian Museum & Art Gallery
GPO Box 1164, Hobart 7001 / 5 Winkleigh Place , Rosny 7018

Phone 61 3 6211 4124
Personal mobile (not paid by TMAG) 0498 318710



The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission.
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu

The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:

(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org

(2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here

Celebrating 26 years of Taxacom in 2013.

More information about the Taxacom mailing list