[Taxacom] What exactly is or is not a Gondwanan distribution?
stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Wed Mar 27 14:36:10 CDT 2013
My understanding is that a Gondwanan distribution is one which is hypothesized to have arisen out of the paleo-continent of Gondwana, so it doesn't matter if there has been some subsequent dispersal into non-Gondwanan areas. Note also that the Indian subcontinent is also Gondwanan, though I know of few Gondwanan taxa which it shares with the other places. And, of course, Antarctica is Gondwanan (important for fossils).
From: "Leavengood,John" <tokay at ufl.edu>
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Sent: Thursday, 28 March 2013 8:17 AM
Subject: [Taxacom] What exactly is or is not a Gondwanan distribution?
I am not well-versed in biogeography; hardly versed at all, in fact.
I have encountered many references to Gondwanan distributions often
pointing to taxa which span Australia, New Zealand, Southern Africa and
Chile/Argentina bound by the Andes. Definitions seem to match this
notion. So if a taxon (say, a tribe) has genera in New Zealand,
Australia, Chile and Argentina, but one genus among them occurs only
east of the Andes from northern Argentina all the way to Guatemala, is
that tribe still considered of Gondwanan distribution?
Why or why not? Or perhaps it points to a certain type of Gondwanan
distribution attributed to a particular timeframe facilitating that one
lineage propagated east of the Andes but has no members west of them?
I would appreciate answers accompanied by references, but all guidance
John M. Leavengood, Jr.
University of Kentucky
Department of Entomology
S-225 Agricultural Science
Center Building - North
Lexington, KY 40546-0091
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org/
(2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
Celebrating 26 years of Taxacom in 2013.
More information about the Taxacom