[Taxacom] Homo sapiens neanderthalensis
kinman at hotmail.com
Sun May 19 18:18:41 CDT 2013
I wouldn't single out any one of those mechanisms in particular, since it could be the result of a combination of two or more mechanisms. Not sure if any molecularists have plans to test such possibilities or not. However, I am optimistic that increasing interest in the subject of Neanderthal-modern hybrids (or integrades, if you will), will yield more fossils and additional discoveries coming from a more intense study of the Neanderthal (and Denisovan) genomes. I assume some papers are probable already in the pipeline and am looking forward to more surprises.
> Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 13:31:22 -0700
> From: lists at curtisclark.org
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Homo sapiens neanderthalensis
> On 2013-05-19 12:42 PM, Ken Kinman wrote:
> > Although most of today's populations have only about 2-4% Neanderthal
> > genes, that percentage was probably much higher while Neanderthals
> > were still around and gradually decreased over time.
> What mechanism do you propose? Increased back-crossing to modern humans?
> Selection against intermediate phenotypes? Subsequent influx of
> additional modern humans? Higher reproductive rate of modern humans
> leading to exaggerated differences in population sizes? Any of these
> seem reasonable, and all are at least theoretically testable, although
> the paucity of fossil evidence makes testing difficult. But the bottom
> line is that no had-waving is needed.
> Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark
> Biological Sciences +1 909 869 4140
> Cal Poly Pomona, Pomona CA 91768
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> (2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
> Celebrating 26 years of Taxacom in 2013.
More information about the Taxacom