[Taxacom] double-peaked mountains
lists at curtisclark.org
Fri Nov 29 23:55:02 CST 2013
On 2013-11-29 8:33 PM, Stephen Thorpe wrote:
> I was glossing over problems with defining the individual, as they
> aren't relevant to my main point, but, to be pedantic, all we ever
> actually see are parts of individuals
To be pedantic, you aren't the man you used to be; most of your atoms
have been replaced since your birth or even adolescence, with atoms that
at one time were likely part of a different "individual". What's the
individual? I know you seem real to yourself, and I as a similar "being"
fully accept that you are, but demonstrating that you exist as an
individual requires more than hand-waving. Hence the demonstration that
"individual" has a special role in biology also requires more than
hand-waving. Frankly, it's just about as scientific as saying "species
are the basic units of evolution".
Apropos the article, the value of Wilkins's approach is that it doesn't
require that "species" be definable.
Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark
Biological Sciences +1 909 869 4140
Cal Poly Pomona, Pomona CA 91768
More information about the Taxacom