[Taxacom] Binomial Nomenclature - was: "cataloguing hypotheses & not real things"

Fred Schueler bckcdb at istar.ca
Sun Sep 1 08:26:15 CDT 2013

On 9/1/2013 8:18 AM, Fred Schueler wrote:
> On 9/1/2013 5:58 AM, Dan Lahr wrote:
>> One of the things that I often wonder is why nobody ever suggested a more
>> logical, parsimonious and I suspect bioinformatics friendlier (not my area,
>> can someone confirm?) transition to uninomial nomenclature.
> nobody? - Rising, James D., and Frederick W.  Schueler.  1972.  How
> stable is binominal nomenclature?  Systematic Zoology 21:438-439 - it's
> been suggested many times, it's just that adoption would require large
> numbers of taxonomists to agree on something, which runs counter to the
> spirit of the Codes.

* and just as a final comment for today, the big problem with uninominal 
nomenclature is that the only plausible starting point for it is a 
hypenation or something of the existing binominal names (Rising & 
Schueler, 1972), which would fix forever the existing generic 
arrangements in the minds of the taxonomically naive users, who are 
supposed to be the main beneficiary of uninominal names...

          Frederick W. Schueler & Aleta Karstad
Bishops Mills Natural History Centre - http://pinicola.ca/bmnhc.htm
Mudpuppy Night in Oxford Mills - http://pinicola.ca/mudpup1.htm
Daily Paintings - http://karstaddailypaintings.blogspot.com/
          RR#2 Bishops Mills, Ontario, Canada K0G 1T0
   on the Smiths Falls Limestone Plain 44* 52'N 75* 42'W
    (613)258-3107 <bckcdb at istar.ca> http://pinicola.ca/

More information about the Taxacom mailing list