[Taxacom] More on Linnaeus
lists at curtisclark.org
Wed Sep 4 22:25:10 CDT 2013
On 2013-09-04 7:53 PM, Stephen Thorpe wrote:
> My understanding of what was in Linnaeus' mind is slightly different:
> The binomial system was analogous to the binomial system of people's
> names, where the genus is analogous to the surname and represents
> "family relationship", so classification did have everything to do
> with it (and this is independent of creationism/evolutionism).
I believe Stafleu would disagree, since the epithet was an afterthought.
> But there are far more species than Linnaeus predicted, so we needed
> far more genera and this required other categories to manage the
> genera effectively. The term "family" got hijacked for a suprageneric
> category, though it would perhaps have been a better term for what we
> call 'genus' ...
This was actually an important factor in where his students went with
his system. The issue is that special creation rules out a genealogical
relationship, so it created a tension that resulted (in part) in Darwin.
Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark
Biological Sciences +1 909 869 4140
Cal Poly Pomona, Pomona CA 91768
More information about the Taxacom