[Taxacom] Neoromicia nanus or Neoromicia nana?
aborisen at uoguelph.ca
Sun Jan 12 15:39:12 CST 2014
Thanks a lot to Doug, Gary and others for weighing in and for the helpful resources.
It looks from all this evidence that we should keep using "Neoromicia nanus" and should retain the species epithet as unchangeable if the species changes genus yet again.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Yanega" <dyanega at ucr.edu>
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 1:55:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Neoromicia nanus or Neoromicia nana?
On 1/11/14 10:42 AM, Doug Yanega wrote:
> On 1/11/14 7:15 AM, David Campbell wrote:
>> As specific epithets are often repeatedly used, a compilation of them
>> with grammatical remarks could be a useful resource.
> A resource I have found useful, despite a very small number of cases (2
> or 3) where I have found solid contrary evidence, is this one:
I forgot to note that "nanus" is one of those 2 or 3 cases I found where
the evidence indicates contrary to what is on this page; he treats it as
adjectival, and I have yet to see evidence that it is.
Doug Yanega Dept. of Entomology Entomology Research Museum
Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0314 skype: dyanega
phone: (951) 827-4315 (disclaimer: opinions are mine, not UCR's)
"There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness
is the true method" - Herman Melville, Moby Dick, Chap. 82
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
(2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
Celebrating 26 years of Taxacom in 2013.
More information about the Taxacom