[Taxacom] Neoromicia nanus or Neoromicia nana?

Francisco Welter-Schultes fwelter at gwdg.de
Tue Jan 14 15:03:43 CST 2014


I appreciate your valuable suggestions and contributions to such
discussions. Your proposal sounds good, at least from a theoretical point
of view. For the practical life I would modify the time spans and say, at
least one year is fine, but I would add an additional requirement that at
least 4 or 5 independent researchers with approved experise in the
discipline (I see the difficulty to define such a status) must confirm the
correctness of an entry, before the entry gets an approved status. Maybe
these thoughts are already incorporated in your model. Just absence of
sufficient affirmative comments within 3 or 5 years should not
automatically lead to modifying the official status of a name.

My experience is that at least malacologists may easily take more than ten
years until an expert finds the time to work on such an issue. In many
subgroups it's 20 years. This is due to the unpaid nature of professional
work in this field.


> On 1/14/14 4:26 AM, Francisco Welter-Schultes wrote:
>>> On 1/13/14 11:11 AM, Stephen Thorpe wrote:
>>>> This is perhaps a good example of why the Code requires
>>>> simplification?
>>>> Endless debate over Latin grammar doesn't really help biological
>>>> understanding!
>>> I figured you wouldn't be able to restrain yourself. This is precisely
>>> why I commented that we can use registration to solve the problem. Once
>>> a name is registered as a noun or adjective, the debate ENDS.
>> I am not in favour of a rule that the First Person to Place an Entry
>> into
>> an electronic data resource has the right to take such a decision and to
>> stop a debate in this form. There must be escape rules what to do if the
>> entry is incorrect, and there again the debate would continue.
> As this system has not been implemented yet, there are details that can
> be ironed out, and one of those details is that Registered records are
> likely to be in "tiers" based on the degree of review they have
> received. That is, a raw entry into ZooBank would have no formal
> standing (lowest tier) until it has been reviewed and confirmed by at
> least one other person to ensure the entry is thorough and accurate;
> once confirmed (middle tier), it would be subject to community review
> for a specified time period, and if it receives a certain number of
> affirmations, it could be declared Official and unalterable (upper
> tier). The step you are concerned about would be incorporated into that
> public review period. In other words, instead of the debate ending the
> instant a name is Registered, the debate would end after a fixed time
> interval (maybe a year at most). This is somewhat similar to the LAN
> mechanism that is already in place in the Code - Article 79 - except
> that the LAN process takes 4 years.
>>> Robert's arguments, BTW, are sound, but the ICZN does indeed work
>>> differently from botany; if a name can be either a noun or an adjective
>>> (which is what is claimed for nanus), then it is noun by default under
>>> Art. 31.2.2.
>> I also regard this point as valid, however I do not consider this as a
>> useful rule. It seems the rule is not used in the community, at least
>> not
>> strictly, and at least not by the malacological community. It should be
>> replaced by a better rule in the next edition. I fully agree with
>> Stephen.
> I would hazard to guess that if the malacological community were
> informed that they had exactly one year to come to an agreement on
> disputed names, after which those names would no longer be subject to
> debate, then this problem could be solved within a year. If the
> community is tired of endless debates, then just implement a deadline
> like this or submit a LAN proposal.
> Sincerely,
> --
> Doug Yanega      Dept. of Entomology       Entomology Research Museum
> Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0314     skype: dyanega
> phone: (951) 827-4315 (disclaimer: opinions are mine, not UCR's)
>               http://cache.ucr.edu/~heraty/yanega.html
>    "There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness
>          is the true method" - Herman Melville, Moby Dick, Chap. 82
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched with either of these
> methods:
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> (2) a Google search specified as:
> site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
> Celebrating 26 years of Taxacom in 2013.

Francisco Welter-Schultes
Zoologisches Institut, Berliner Str. 28, D-37073 Goettingen
Phone +49 551 395536

More information about the Taxacom mailing list