[Taxacom] Paraphyletic groups as natural units of biological classification

Stephen Thorpe stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Thu Oct 2 01:09:26 CDT 2014

That was uncalled for! I was trying to articulate an idea. If my terminology wuz in some way inappropriate, I apologise, but it was entirely unintentional. Let me rephrase it in the form of a question: do you think it is common (or even possible) for a monophyletic group (M) to evolve quickly (within a larger monophylum), leaving only a remainder of plesiomorphic species which are very similar to each other, but very different to M?


On Thu, 2/10/14, Curtis Clark <lists at curtisclark.org> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Paraphyletic groups as natural units of biological classification
 To: "taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
 Received: Thursday, 2 October, 2014, 6:45 PM
 On 2014-09-30 5:14 PM,
 Stephen Thorpe wrote:
 > I suspect that
 evolution is intrinsically paraphyletic,
 > ... just a bunch of
 plesiomorphic species,
 When you use words
 however you like, no one can effectively challenge 
 your views, because you are no longer
 communicating science.
 Curtis Clark        http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark
 Biological Sciences               
    +1 909 869 4140
 Cal Poly
 Pomona, Pomona CA 91768
 Taxacom Mailing List
 Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
 The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be
 searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
 Celebrating 27 years of
 Taxacom in 2014.

More information about the Taxacom mailing list