[Taxacom] The Index Kewensis we were once Proud of and The PlantList
lists at curtisclark.org
Sun Sep 14 13:55:27 CDT 2014
On 2014-09-13 8:54 AM, Gurcharan Singh wrote:
> More so
> if we have a subspecies foemina, we also need to have a subspecies
> anagallis, and var. caerulea has to find place among any of these two, not
> just a variety under the species. The example I have given defies all rules
> of botanical nomenclature.
I used to think that, too, but several years ago on Taxacom it was
pointed out by several scholars more expert in the Code than I that
placing a variety within a subspecies is a classification, not a name.
Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark
Biological Sciences +1 909 869 4140
Cal Poly Pomona, Pomona CA 91768
More information about the Taxacom