[Taxacom] Forgotting at the edge of miracles

Neal Evenhuis neale at bishopmuseum.org
Sat Apr 25 21:16:08 CDT 2015


If you use chickens, you can at least get a pecking order...



On Stardate 4/25/15 3:43 PM, "Anthony Gill" <gill.anthony at gmail.com> wrote:

>Well, I've just set up a bunch of monkeys on laptops. I'm not expecting
>Shakespeare's sonnets, but given enough time I'm hoping they'll knock out
>a
>decent taxonomic monograph or two.
>
>On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 8:34 AM, John Grehan <calabar.john at gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> If Stephen's view of biogeography is that it is just a series of beliefs
>> or assertions then there is certainly not much more to be said about
>>that.
>> Everyone is entitled to their beliefs and there is no where further to
>>go
>> with that. But if one views biogeography as a science in the sense of
>> applying methods of analysis (of geography and phylogeny) then one goes
>> beyond just stating a personal belief to presenting a reasoned
>>judgement or
>> argument about the efficacy of particular methods and their results - as
>> with any other science.
>>
>> John Grehan
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Stephen Thorpe <
>> stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz> wrote:
>>
>>> Biogeography is just a pompous "academic" (in the worst sense) waste of
>>> time! Putting aside, for present purposes, the vast issue of marine
>>> biogeography, chance transoceanic dispersal of terrestrials is
>>>*unlikely*,
>>> yes, but all that means is that it isn't going to happen lots of times
>>>in a
>>> short stretch of time. Given many millions of years, it can still
>>>happen
>>> often enough to be a significant factor. There seems to be a slide from
>>> "unlikely to happen" to "can't happen"! Any academic discipline which
>>>is
>>> based ultimately on chance events is not going to be very useful!
>>> Biogeography ... we don't need to know! The existence of sister taxa on
>>> adjacent islands (or other landmasses) can be explained equally well by
>>> dispersal (since dispersal is most likely to happen between adjacent
>>> landmasses) or by vicariance (since vicariance is most likely to happen
>>> between adjacent landmasses)!
>>>
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------
>>> On Sun, 26/4/15, Richard Pyle <deepreef at bishopmuseum.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Forgotting at the edge of miracles
>>>  To: "'Anthony Gill'" <gill.anthony at gmail.com>, "'Karl Magnacca'" <
>>> kmagnacca at wesleyan.edu>
>>>  Cc: "'TAXACOM'" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>, "'Dr. Antonio Lopez'" <
>>> cycas at mnhnc.inf.cu>
>>>  Received: Sunday, 26 April, 2015, 12:35 AM
>>>
>>>  The same argument could
>>>  be applied to ANY model of biogeography (dispersal,
>>>  vicariance, panbiogeography, etc., etc.)  That is, any
>>>  presumption that any single model accounts for every pattern
>>>  (or even most patterns) is, in my opinion, naïve.  This is
>>>  not to say that, in the end, one model does not dominate.
>>>  But we are SO, SO, SO far away from understanding both
>>>  evolutionary history and the actual distribution patterns of
>>>  most living things, that only people who don't really
>>>  understand the nature of biodiversity make claims that we
>>>  are close to fully understanding it.
>>>
>>>  Aloha,
>>>  Rich
>>>
>>>
>>>  > -----Original
>>>  Message-----
>>>  > From: Taxacom [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu]
>>>  On Behalf Of
>>>  > Anthony Gill
>>>  > Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 1:12 AM
>>>  > To: Karl Magnacca
>>>  > Cc:
>>>  TAXACOM; Dr. Antonio Lopez
>>>  > Subject: Re:
>>>  [Taxacom] Forgotting at the edge of miracles
>>>  >
>>>  > Of course, there are
>>>  other from beyond panbiogeography that are concerned
>>>  > that dispersal explanations should not be
>>>  given a first-order explanation for
>>>  >
>>>  everything in biogeography. There is pattern to be
>>>  discovered and explored. A
>>>  > presumption
>>>  of dispersal as an explanation for everything makes for
>>>  > uninteresting, and ultimately irrelevant,
>>>  research. I want no part of that.
>>>  >
>>>  > Tony
>>>  >
>>>  > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Karl
>>>  Magnacca
>>>  > <kmagnacca at wesleyan.edu>
>>>  > wrote:
>>>  >
>>>  > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:24:32
>>>  "Dr. Antonio Lopez"
>>>  > >
>>>  <cycas at mnhnc.inf.cu>
>>>  wrote:
>>>  > > > Colleague:
>>>  > > >
>>>  > > >
>>>  Thank you for the article of Head. Only when I read
>>>  everything I am
>>>  > > > able to
>>>  understand and to reason. I never understood that
>>>  supposed
>>>  > > > difference between
>>>  dispersalism and vicariancism as different
>>>  > > > schools.
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  > > That's because
>>>  they're not.  It's only in the mind of
>>>  panbiogeograpy
>>>  > > supporters like
>>>  Grehan and Heads, who promote the idea that because
>>>  > > rare trans-oceanic dispersal is
>>>  unlikely, that therefore it never
>>>  > >
>>>  happens (while simultaneously claiming that they say no such
>>>  thing,
>>>  > > invoking the undefined term
>>>  "regular dispersal") that such a dichotomy
>>>  > > exists.
>>>  > >
>>>  > > Karl
>>>  > >
>>>  > >
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  > > Taxacom Mailing List
>>>  > > Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>>>  > > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>>>  > > The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may
>>>  be searched at:
>>>  > > http://taxacom.markmail.org
>>>  > >
>>>  > > Celebrating
>>>  28 years of Taxacom in 2015.
>>>  > >
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  > --
>>>  > Dr Anthony C. Gill
>>>  >
>>>  Natural History Curator
>>>  > A12 Macleay
>>>  Museum
>>>  > University of Sydney
>>>  > NSW 2006
>>>  >
>>>  Australia.
>>>  >
>>>  > Ph.
>>>  +61 02 9036 6499
>>>  >
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  > Taxacom Mailing List
>>>  >
>>>  Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>>>  > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>>>  > The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be
>>>  searched at:
>>>  > http://taxacom.markmail.org
>>>  >
>>>  > Celebrating 28 years
>>>  of Taxacom in 2015.
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  Taxacom Mailing List
>>>  Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>>>  http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>>>  The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be
>>>  searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
>>>
>>>  Celebrating 28 years of
>>>  Taxacom in 2015.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Taxacom Mailing List
>>> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>>> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>>> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
>>> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>>>
>>> Celebrating 28 years of Taxacom in 2015.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>Dr Anthony C. Gill
>Natural History Curator
>A12 Macleay Museum
>University of Sydney
>NSW 2006
>Australia.
>
>Ph. +61 02 9036 6499
>_______________________________________________
>Taxacom Mailing List
>Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
>http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
>Celebrating 28 years of Taxacom in 2015.


This message is only intended for the addressee named above.  Its contents may be privileged or otherwise protected.  Any unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this message or its contents is prohibited.  If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us immediately by reply mail or by collect telephone call.  Any personal opinions expressed in this message do not necessarily represent the views of the Bishop Museum.


More information about the Taxacom mailing list