[Taxacom] Dark Research: a comparison of content discoverability between PLOS ONE and Zootaxa
agosti at amnh.org
Tue Jan 6 02:41:59 CST 2015
Thanks for this study. Did you have a chance to compare your findings with content in the Biodiversity Data Journal (http://bdj.pensoft.net/ ) or its technical precursor, Zookeys (http://www.pensoft.net/journals/zookeys ) both based on Taxpub JATS, that is a semantically enhanced version of JATS a flovor of it is also used in PLoS?
From: Taxacom [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Ross Mounce
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 9:37 AM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: [Taxacom] Dark Research: a comparison of content discoverability between PLOS ONE and Zootaxa
You may be interested in this preprint I wrote on the discoverability of content, particularly phylogenetic content in PLOS ONE & Zootaxa:
Mounce R. (2015) Dark Research: information content in many modern research papers is not easily discoverable online. PeerJ PrePrints 3:e773v1 http://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.773v1
This should be of particular concern to those who have published, or will publish in Zootaxa.
I'm concerned for the discoverability of content in this journal; it doesnt appear to be as good as it could be e.g. at PLOS ONE.
Ross Mounce, PhD
Fossils, Phylogeny and Macroevolution Research Group University of Bath, 4 South Building, Lab 1.07 http://about.me/rossmounce
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Celebrating 28 years of Taxacom in 2015.
More information about the Taxacom