[Taxacom] Proofs for opinion
kwalker at museum.vic.gov.au
Wed Jan 7 17:46:15 CST 2015
Our hope is that the ICZN takes these comments and opinions on board and better defines the code. We all want EV to be a valid publication - make it so.
From: Stephen Thorpe [stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz]
Sent: Thursday, 8 January 2015 10:43 AM
To: Taxacom; Walker, Ken
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Proofs for opinion
Hi Ken (and list):
Unfortunately, no matter how many people agree that something which they desire is so, it doesn't make it so. The issues here are vastly more complicated. The electronic amendment, I suggest, was tailored to the Magnolia Press publishing model, with minimal regard for any other. Hence, it is difficult to fit the Code around other publishing models. The main problem is that the Code fails to define what exactly is meant by a "preliminary version". The botanical code does spell this out (better), but that is of no direct relevance to zoology. So how can we argue the point here, when there is no definition of "preliminary version"? We surely can't just make up whatever definition suits our purposes? My own view is that, on pragmatic grounds, we must consider these "Early View" publications to be validly published (all other things being equal). The big problem which remains, though - and it is something that few people seem to understand - is that although
validly published, how can we verify that they were indeed validly published. Answer: ONLY IF the EARLY VIEW version (PDF) has been archived and is accessible. As far as I can tell, if anything at all gets archived, it is the final paginated version. This could be a problem ...
On Thu, 8/1/15, Walker, Ken <kwalker at museum.vic.gov.au> wrote:
Subject: [Taxacom] Proofs for opinion
To: "Taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Received: Thursday, 8 January, 2015, 12:21 PM
An opinion piece newly published in Systematic Entomology
addresses recent discussion of the taxonomic validity of
names appearing in Early View (that is, new names published
electronically, prior to appearance in a journal issue). Two
previous editors of the journal, Wiley's Publishing Manager
and the taxonomic editor of Austral Entomology combine
to argue that Early View constitutes valid publication.
Eighteen senior systematists, the current editors, the
former Executive Secretary, International Commission on
Zoological Nomenclature and the former Publishing Manager of
Wiley journals endorse the opinion.
The article is free access at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/syen.12119/pdf
This e-mail is solely for the named addressee and may be
confidential. You should only read, disclose, transmit,
copy, distribute, act in reliance on or commercialise the
contents if you are authorised to do so. If you are not the
intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify postmaster at museum.vic.gov.au<mailto:postmaster at museum.vic.gov.au>
by email immediately, or notify the sender and then destroy
any copy of this message. Views expressed in this email are
those of the individual sender, except where specifically
stated to be those of an officer of Museum Victoria. Museum
Victoria does not represent, warrant or guarantee that the
integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that
it is free from errors, virus or interference.
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Celebrating 28 years of Taxacom in 2015.
More information about the Taxacom