[Taxacom] Why Defend the Code?
stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Fri Oct 9 18:13:06 CDT 2015
Putting to one side the personal attacks aimed at me, and the associated false claims (e.g., I do not have "no position", I have an honorary position), I actually agree with Mike that "our system of nomenclature is under attack", and that this is a problem to be solved. I disagree with Mike that the way to solve it is to mindlessly defend the Code as it is. The Code needs to change in order to solve this problem. Specifically, it needs to be simplified so that increasing numbers of people don't just throw their hands up in despair about it and walk away. Claiming that anyone with half a brain can easily understand the Code is only going to frustrate those perfectly intelligent people who find it to be more difficult. Make it easy to do nomenclature, and the problem will solve itself.
On Sat, 10/10/15, Michael A. Ivie <mivie at montana.edu> wrote:
Subject: [Taxacom] Why Defend the Code?
To: "Taxacom List" <TAXACOM at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Received: Saturday, 10 October, 2015, 12:02 PM
This may have been precipitated by a
recent set of events, but it is
targeted at a broader group of messages that put me over the
edge on the
last one. No individual person, living or dead, if
referred to below.
I just received a private email asking why I would waste my
challenging someone with no position, no credibility and
well known as a
pedant and seeker of attention?
Why indeed. Because I am an educator and a
systematist. It is time we
all wake up to a few things. First, our system of
nomenclature is under
attack. Few students are given a class in its use,
most are told the
rules are difficult and arcane. This is giving rise to
a movement to
simply do away with compliance.
Second, compliance with our Code is voluntary. There
enforcement available. We are just a thin line from a
break to anarchy.
Therefore, when someone wants to, repeatedly, claim the Code
is poor, is
difficult, is not well thought out, or otherwise in need of
negative blather, there are people who read that.
Hundreds more are
exposed to this forum than ever post to it. If such
from someone who projects a facade of expertise, people may
him or her.
I understand the Code is not perfect, but it does
work. It does require
diligence, and takes time from other activities that may be
but it is not that hard. We need to reinforce in the
minds of our
peers, and especially the younger members of our profession,
the Code is what is expected, and it is not something to
when mindless attacks are made claiming it is defective,
irrelevant, we must defend it vociferously.
Michael A. Ivie, Ph.D., F.R.E.S.
Montana Entomology Collection
Marsh Labs, Room 50
1911 West Lincoln Street
NW corner of Lincoln and S.19th
Montana State University
Bozeman, MT 59717
(406) 994-4610 (voice)
(406) 994-6029 (FAX)
mivie at montana.edu
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Celebrating 28 years of Taxacom in 2015.
More information about the Taxacom