[Taxacom] manuscript name question

Geoff Read gread at actrix.gen.nz
Fri Oct 9 22:55:29 CDT 2015


Although there is clearly a group who believe that the fly photo
description "was unambiguously Code-compliant" under the current code,
this is not correct.

Read again Markus Moser's eletter "Holotypic ink" in Science from 2005 (a
response to a comment and response about the Mangabey monkey picture,
under the doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.309.5744.2163c


Use of 73.1.4 for new taxa is a distortion of the article's intention
which "... clearly refers to established species of which the types got
lost somehow or are missing"

Geoffrey B. Read, Ph.D.
Wellington, NEW ZEALAND
gread at actrix.gen.nz

More information about the Taxacom mailing list