[Taxacom] Wikidata and Wikispecies

Roderic Page Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk
Thu Oct 29 04:10:57 CDT 2015


Hi Paul,

> 
> Your last paragraph might be interpreted by some to mean that you consider the existing resources in the domain of nomenclature and taxonomy are not useful. Since molecular data are now very important in defining taxa in the fungi perhaps Wikidata should be encouraged to duplicate the resources available from the INSDC ;-)
> 
> Paul


Not sure how you got that impression :O  Instead I’d like identifiers for taxa (NCBI, GBIF, EOL, etc., etc.) to go with taxa, and identifiers for names (ION, IPNI, ZooBank, Index Fungorum, etc., etc.) to go with names.

Regards

Rod


> ________________________________________
> From: Taxacom <taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> on behalf of Roderic Page <Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk>
> Sent: 27 October 2015 07:52
> To: Andy Mabbett
> Cc: Taxa com
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Wikidata and Wikispecies
> 
> Hi Andy,
> 
> Not quite. In the example you give the taxon name is a simple string, whereas I'd ague it should be an item with its own properties. In the same way that for people Wikidata can first and last names as items, e..g.  https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Q272518  rather than strings.
> 
> Doing this will (a) avoid conflating names and taxa, and (b) make Wikidata a lot more attractive as a repository of nomenclatural facts, many of which are a good fit for Wikidata (dates, people, publications, specimens). It also means you could align Wikidata with the main repositories of nomenclature, such as ZooBank, ION, IPNI, etc.
> 
> I guess I think Wikidata has an opportunity to be genuinely useful to biologists if it spends a little time to sort out how it models taxa and names, otherwise it's an opportunity missed.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Rod
> 
> Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/Ox5hz3>
> 
> _____________________________
> From: Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk<mailto:andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk>>
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 8:53 p.m.
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Wikidata and Wikispecies
> To: Roderic Page <roderic.page at glasgow.ac.uk<mailto:roderic.page at glasgow.ac.uk>>
> 
> 
> On 25 October 2015 at 12:08, Roderic Page <Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk<mailto:Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk>> wrote:
>> From my perspective, leaving aside any sociology, Wikispecies’ biggest
>> limitation was that it didn’t cleanly separate taxonomic names (factual
>> statements about who published a name and where and when they did that) and
>> taxonomic concepts (“taxa”, the things that most biologists talk about, such
>> as a particular species).
> 
> On the contrary, I think it does.
> 
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q25404 is a Wikidata item representing a
> species (taxon). One property of that item is that it is known by the
> taxon name (P225) "Cyanistes caeruleus", - which, further, was
> authored (P405) by Lnnaeus (item Q1043) in the year (P574) 1758.
> 
> Or is that not what you meant?
> 
> 
> Anyone wanting to know more, or to contribute, may do so at:
> 
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Taxonomy
> 
> --
> Andy Mabbett
> @pigsonthewing
> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
> 
> 
> On 25 October 2015 at 12:08, Roderic Page <Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk> wrote:
>> From my perspective, leaving aside any sociology, Wikispecies’ biggest
>> limitation was that it didn’t cleanly separate taxonomic names (factual
>> statements about who published a name and where and when they did that) and
>> taxonomic concepts (“taxa”, the things that most biologists talk about, such
>> as a particular species).
> 
> On the contrary, I think it does.
> 
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q25404 is a Wikidata item representing a
> species (taxon). One property of that item is that it is known by the
> taxon name (P225) "Cyanistes caeruleus",  - which, further, was
> authored (P405) by Lnnaeus (item Q1043) in the year (P574) 1758.
> 
> Or is that not what you meant?
> 
> 
> Anyone wanting to know more, or to contribute, may do so at:
> 
>   https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Taxonomy
> 
> --
> Andy Mabbett
> @pigsonthewing
> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
> 
> Celebrating 28 years of Taxacom in 2015.




More information about the Taxacom mailing list