[Taxacom] resend Kingdom Protista (and Subkingdom Chromista)
aphodiinaemate at gmail.com
Fri Oct 30 14:39:06 CDT 2015
Dan, it was not a criticism, I was simply pointing out that "absurd" is
synonymous with "illogical" and taste cannot be logical, quite the
contrary. I agree that classifications are arbitrary, and I think we all
agree that polyphyly is very wrong. However, like the six wise men of
Hindostan, it very much depends which part of the biodiversity elephant
you touch, your perspective affords a completely different idea on
paraphyly. So I will rephrase by saying that one does not follow the other,
as a general rule.
On 30 October 2015 at 18:47, Dan Lahr <dlahr at ib.usp.br> wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> "Dan, if we accept that "Classifications are arbitrary, and are thus
> used (cited) in ways to please
> one's own taste." then " accepting paraphyletic groups is simply
> absurd in my view." does not follow."
> Really? It is my taste! Follows perfectly... I find it absurd and thus I
> don't cite it.
> However, my taxonomic experience is not with hyper-diverse groups. I can
> see how it may be sensible in some world that paraphyletic groupings are
> accepted for things such as insects - Ken does aptly name his proposition
> Daniel J. G. Lahr
> PhD, Assist. Prof.
> Dept of Zoology, Univ. of Sao Paulo, Brazil
> Office number: + 55 (11) 3091 0948
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 3:33 PM, JF Mate <aphodiinaemate at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dan, if we accept that "Classifications are arbitrary, and are thus
>> used (cited) in ways to please
>> one's own taste." then " accepting paraphyletic groups is simply
>> absurd in my view." does not follow.
>> I find that stem/paraphyletic groups tend to be less agressively
>> dispised in taxa with either a good fossil record or insects. As long
>> as they are flagged as such they are more useful than 10 monotypic
>> genera created to keep a crown clade. Maybe when the pendulum swings
>> back from the current splitting spree we can have a sensible
>> classification that is cladistically congruent as well. IMO.
>> Taxacom Mailing List
>> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
>> Celebrating 28 years of Taxacom in 2015.
More information about the Taxacom