[Taxacom] Paywall our taxonomic tidbit
stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Mon Jan 18 15:16:09 CST 2016
PS: Also, this doesn't explain the current popularity of Gold OA journals like ZooKeys. Are all the authors foolish? If I were a conspiracy theorist, which I'm not, I'd suggest that Pensoft's sales pitch might be "Got research money to ditch? We'll happily take it off your hands! We're good like that!" At any rate, we also have the data reuse problem, which it seems can only be solved by Gold OA. So, all in all a very complex situation, which much potential for abuse. Not something to be taken on lightly, without thinking everything through.
On Tue, 19/1/16, rch <rch at skynet.be> wrote:
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Paywall our taxonomic tidbit
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Received: Tuesday, 19 January, 2016, 9:35 AM
Stephen Thorpe wrote
"OK, so wtf is going on here?? ..."
I forwarded that question to Stevan Harnad, who knows more
things than I do
(1) Paying for Open Access (OA) Publishing (Gold OA) is not
the only way
to provide OA, nor is it the best way.
(2) The best way is to publish in the most suitable journal
and to make
the final draft OA by self-archiving it in your
at no cost (**[Green OA]**).
(3) Yes, it is foolish to divert scarce research funds to
pay for Gold
OA (**[“Fool’s Gold OA”]**)
(4) Once Green OA prevails globally, **[subscriptions will
unsustainable]** and will be cancelled and publishers will
costs and downsize and convert to affordable, sustainable
OA]** paid for not out of research funds but out of a
fraction of the
institutional subscription cancellation savings windfall.
In case those **links** dont survive the journey, here they
are en claire:-
**Fool's Gold OA
Google harnad ("fool's gold" OR "fools gold")
**Subscriptions will become unsustainable
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Celebrating 29 years of Taxacom in 2016.
More information about the Taxacom