[Taxacom] Important note Re: two names online published - one new species

John Bain John.Bain at scionresearch.com
Mon Jan 25 01:18:22 CST 2016

This is getting very boring. Plain semantics. Please desist (yes, you.Stephen)
Sigh, John.

Sent from Samsung Mobile

-------- Original message --------
From: Stephen Thorpe
Date:25/01/2016 2:50 PM (GMT+12:00)
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu,"Michael A. Ivie"
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Important note Re: two names online published - one new species

Also, in the category of evidence, I draw the reader's attention to this previous post (by none other than Frank Krell) on Taxacom (Sep 12, 2012):


[Quote]I pleaded to have this [definition of "preliminary version"] clarified in the the Amendment but this was considered unnecessary for the time being - the beauty of committee work.[unquote]

Call me a "conspiracy theorist", but to me this clearly indicates dissent within the ranks of the ICZN, with recommendations from within for the greater good being ignored/suppressed! Note that Zootaxa does not publish preliminary versions, so no definition is needed!


Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org

Celebrating 29 years of Taxacom in 2016.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain information which is confidential or subject to copyright. If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it. Scion does not accept responsibility for anything in this e-mail which is not provided in the course of Scion's usual business or for any computer virus, data corruption, interference or delay arising from this e-mail.

More information about the Taxacom mailing list