[Taxacom] Hierarchical clustering techniques appropriate in this case?
Mary.Barkworth at usu.edu
Thu Nov 17 10:50:19 CST 2016
My immediate reaction: Do both and look at the differences in groupings. The big question is what you are want to find out. It might be interesting to see the extent that dates of publication and teacher-student relationships influence groupings.
From: Taxacom [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Jorge A. Santiago-Blay
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 9:44 AM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: [Taxacom] Hierarchical clustering techniques appropriate in this case?
Hierarchical clustering techniques appropriate in this case?
I have a big dataset (over 150 cases) of old books on topic A. For each book, some 20 characteristics (mostly pertaining to their contents) have been collected. I would like to generate a little "phylogeny" of these books. My first thought was to use standard phylogenetic techniques yet in discussing the matters with colleagues in statistics they suggested to use hierarchical clustering techniques.
If you have any recommendations on the matter, could you send it directly to me?
blayjorge at gmail.com
Apologies for potential duplicate emails.
Jorge A. Santiago-Blay, PhD
1. Positive experiences for authors of papers published in *LEB* http://blaypublishers.com/testimonials/
2. Free examples of papers published in *LEB*:
3. *Guidelines for Authors* and page charges of *LEB*:
4. Want to subscribe to *LEB*? http://blaypublishers.com/subscriptions/
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Injecting Intellectual Liquidity for 29 years.
More information about the Taxacom