[Taxacom] Museum abbreviations thanks
schindeld at si.edu
Thu Oct 27 12:18:11 CDT 2016
These "abbreviations" correspond to institutionCodes and collectionCodes in the Darwin Core Standard. While these concepts are reasonably clear the implementation has been fragmented. Many communities of taxonomists have proceeded independent of each other to create their own "standard" lists of unique codes. As we noted in our Biodiversity Data Journal, when these lists are combined we find a significant number of cases where the same code is used by multiple institutions, or a code is used by an institution and by one collection within it. As a result, the code attached to a specimen in a publication can be ambiguous. It's another frustrating case of taxonomists working in taxon-bounded silos rather than as part of a larger enterprise.
From: Taxacom [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of John Grehan
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 12:55 PM
Subject: [Taxacom] Museum abbreviations thanks
My thanks to everyone who responded on and off list. It seems that there is
no predominantly necessary format, although there are some more widely used
conventions and some consistent between disciplines. It seems that the
principal requirement is to define the abbreviations chosen in a
publication. The feedback was most helpful and insightful.
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Injecting Intellectual Liquidity for 29 years.
More information about the Taxacom