[Taxacom] Paralectotype question
adamcot at cscoms.com
Thu Apr 20 14:13:13 CDT 2017
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Thorpe" <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>
To: <rz at berkeley.edu>; <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>; "Adam Cotton"
<adamcot at cscoms.com>
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Paralectotype question
> Adam's reply seems a little confusing to me. Robert specifically stated
> that Orth never saw the fourth specimen, so it cannot be a paralectotype.
> The fact that it is from the same collecting event is irrelevant.
Orth was not the author of the taxon, he subsequently designated a
lectotype. Whether or not he saw the fourth specimen is irrelevant to its
status as a syntype, and thus as a paralectotype after lectotype
More information about the Taxacom