[Taxacom] parentheses (or not) on Nemophora tyriochrysa Meyrick, 1935
calabar.john at gmail.com
Wed Aug 23 13:06:30 CDT 2017
And I would add that there is no Lep community when it comes to gender
agreement. Maybe most do not worry about it, but either way it's not a
'community decision'. Certainly it is a confusing situation.For the group I
study a global list was one setup for which I understand that gender
agreement was not followed, but I did not have the level of fanatical
intent (in this particular case) to check up on the gender applicable for
each species and so unless something indicates the need to the contrary I
have followed that list. For example, there was case the usage in the
country of origin for a particular species did follow gender agreement
(following a taxonomic revision to that effect) so I ignore the global list
preference for not doing so.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Adam Cotton <adamcot at cscoms.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ivie, Michael" <mivie at montana.edu>
> To: "Soowon Cho" <chosoowon at gmail.com>; <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 12:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] parentheses (or not) on Nemophora tyriochrysa
> The lep community has collectively decided to ignore the Code, and they
>> don't use parentheses.
> The above statement is incorrect.
> Lepidopterists certainly do follow the Code in every aspect *except gender
> agreement* and definitely do use parentheses when a taxon has been moved to
> a different genus to the one it was originally described under.
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu,
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Web, visit:
> You can reach the person managing the list at:
> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Nurturing Nuance while Assaulting Ambiguity for 30 Some Years, 1987-2017.
More information about the Taxacom