tonyrees49 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 6 15:00:09 CST 2017
Hello Jan, Stephen et al.,
I do not have a problem with citing authors for ranks above family, as per
the example at
. Although the zoological Code does not regulate these, it does not
therefore mean they cannot be used in this manner, if zoologists so desire.
Just like a name at any regulated rank, the citation indicates who erected
the name, not necessarily its current circumscription.
Best regards - Tony
Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
On 7 February 2017 at 07:24, Jan Bosselaers <dochterland at telenet.be> wrote:
> Thanks Stephen, for pointing this out to me! Much appreciated.
> Best wishes (the best wishes in Belgium - it’s true),
> > From: Taxacom
> > <taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> on behalf of
> > Stephen Thorpe <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>
> > Sent: 06 February 2017 19:56
> > To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu; Jan Bosselaers
> > Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Citation
> > Strictly
> > speaking, there is no "citation" for that taxon
> > name, as names for classes are not regulated by any code of
> > nomenclature. Attribution of Arachnida to Cuvier 1812 is
> > meaningless and potentially rather misleading given how
> > taxonomic
> > concepts change over time.
> > Stephen
More information about the Taxacom