[Taxacom] Taxonomy Anarchy
ipvl2008 at mail.ru
Thu Jun 1 23:54:20 CDT 2017
As a matter of sad fact, this paper is not the first and the only attepmt to regulate taxomits' activity from a pragnamtic standpoint. There is a lot of such instances. Just read this paper on "unitary taxonomy" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15253355) to see such a position is not uncommon.
Practitions use to wish there taxonomic "backbone" is stable and thus allows to plane and do their buiseness effectively, While those "anarchic" taxonomists devoted to their "anarchic" science disturbe their long-run business stategy.
It is strange that the Nature published this article. It would much more strange if it would reject a panel discussion to give researchers a possibility to declare there position, actually a scientific one not an "applied".
- - -
Igor Ya. Pavlinov, DrS
Zoological Museum of Lomonosov Moscow State University
ul. Bol'shaya Nikitskaya 6
>Четверг, 1 июня 2017, 17:57 +03:00 от Richard Zander <Richard.Zander at mobot.org>:
>Another thing for taxonomists to worry about:
>"Taxonomy anarchy" and its supposed solution. Journal Nature.
>Richard H. Zander
>Missouri Botanical Garden - 4344 Shaw Blvd. - St. Louis - Missouri - 63110 - USA
>richard.zander at mobot.org<mailto: richard.zander at mobot.org >
>Web sites: http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/bfna/bfnamenu.htm and http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/resbot/
>Taxacom Mailing List
>Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
>Nurturing Nuance while Assaulting Ambiguity for 30 Some Years, 1987-2017.
More information about the Taxacom