[Taxacom] Have you named a taxon?
Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk
Sat Mar 18 08:58:12 CDT 2017
Thanks for the link to the discussion on Wikispecies. It looks like a classic case of trying to reconcile different needs (ease of editing versus ease of data mining) that are seen to be in conflict.
I’m planning to be at WikiCite 2017, which is one reason I’ve been exploring Wikispecies recently.
On 18 Mar 2017, at 13:31, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk<mailto:andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk>> wrote:
On 18 March 2017 at 11:26, Roderic Page <Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk<mailto:Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk>> wrote:
My own interest is in using Wikispecies is the following:
There is no point any of us work on on Wikispecies, or other Wikimedia
projects, if the results are not useful to data consumers like you.
It would be nice to be able to feed the links to BioStor, BHL, and DOIs back
to Wikispecies as well. At the moment the biggest obstacle I face is writing
code to parse all the different ways contributors use to write references
(and reference templates) in Wikispecies.
It would be useful if you, and other data consumers, could outline
your needs on Wikispecies. In this case, I will cite your post there.
But I realise this use case is not
necessarily high on the agenda of Wikispecies contributors.
It is for some of us.
It's also worth bearing in mind the Wikicite initiative:
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Nurturing Nuance while Assaulting Ambiguity for 30 Years, 1987-2017.
Professor of Taxonomy
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine
College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences
Graham Kerr Building
University of Glasgow
Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
Email: Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk<mailto:Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk>
Tel: +44 141 330 4778
More information about the Taxacom