[Taxacom] Question about nomina nuda as type species

Guilherme Garbino gstgarbino at gmail.com
Mon Sep 18 06:33:42 CDT 2017


Dear colleagues,

Thank you for the answers.

Stephen, thank you for your clarirfication. Yes, I am talking about
ZOOLOGICAL nomenclature. But could not find this specific case in the Code.
I agree with you that the type designation in this case cannot be sustained
and a new type species must be selected.

David, thanks for the link. It however does not contemplate the situation
where a nomen nudum is selected at type for a genus.

All the best,

2017-09-18 6:31 GMT-03:00 David Patterson <patterson.david.joseph at gmail.com>
:

> see
>
> http://iczn.org/content/what-nomen-nudum
>
> David
>
> David J. Patterson
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Guilherme Garbino <gstgarbino at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> I have a short question on nomina nuda as type species.
>>
>> If a subsequent author chose as type species of a genus a nomen nudum, can
>> another author invalidate this selection and chosse a valid taxon instead?
>> He could have chosen a valid name but chose the nomen nudum following the
>> recommendation to choose the first species in the list under the genus.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> _______________________________________________
>> Taxacom Mailing List
>> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu,
>> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
>> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>>
>> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Web, visit:
>> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>> You can reach the person managing the list at:
>> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>>
>> Nurturing Nuance while Assaulting Ambiguity for 30 Some Years, 1987-2017.
>>
>
>


More information about the Taxacom mailing list